Advantages & Disadvantages of Mivan Shuttering:
Advantages:
It reduces construction time by approximately half compared to conventional construction methods.
Minimizes deployment of skilled labor and does away with labor-intensive jobs like carpentry and masonry.
Provides a seismic-resistant structure
The resultant structure is more durable.
Disadvantages:
The finished structure may have noticeable finishing lines if the components used are smaller in dimension.
Post-casting modifications to the structures are difficult, thus causing the building to be inflexible.
Possibility of cracks showing up on the slabs & walls due to shrinkage though preventable through control strips or reduction in the hydration heat generated due to the chemical reaction between cement and water by mixing fly ash.
Aspects That Make MIVAN Technology Unique:
Rapidity - Cuts building time down the middle when contrasted with conventional techniques.
Demands - A laid out strategy and systems make this technology less labor-intensive and remove the need for brickwork and rendering, which are labor-intensive.
Less Maintenance - This approach diminishes the probability of drainage by utilizing free-flow concrete and avoiding building joints, resulting in less maintenance.
Smooth finish - Due tothe homogeneity of Mivan development, all walls and chunks have a smooth surface that wipes out the requirement for additional putting.
Higher carpet area - Compared to more conventional structure strategies, it takes into account more noteworthy expulsion of rug region.
Earthquake resistant - More secure in the event of a major quake because of the expanded seismic opposition of the structure. This is because Mivan-built buildings are single, solid concrete units.
No comments:
Post a Comment